In other features, Peter Rowlands chats to veteran shooter and Ikelike Ambassador David Fleetham, the Backscatter team expounds the joys of fluoro using their new excitation filter for the Hybrid Flash, Lars Stenholt Kirkegaard goes on a fascinating nudibranch safari at Gulen Dive Resort in Norway, and Colin Munro recounts his search for the planet’s second-largest fish—the basking shark—off the west coast of Scotland and Southwest England.
Getting your free copy of the latest issue of Underwater Photography magazine is a breeze: Simply sign up with your email to get access. If you’ve already signed up (and you’re logged in), you can download your copy directly here.
Film photography has never really gone away. Sure, it’s declined massively since the arrival of digital, however these days increasing numbers of newer photographers are trying their hand at film photography.
I have written several articles about shooting film here at Light Stalking, yet I have realized that there may well be an entire section of you that know little to nothing about it.
Many of you will have developed your photographic skills through the digital age, and whilst understanding the existence of film photography may be daunted by trying it out for yourselves. So today I am going to look at the absolute basics. Cameras, films, processing and shooting on film. Let’s get into it by looking at film.
There are a plethera of film cameras available for all budgets. By Mali Maeder on Pexels
Photographic Films
Photographic films can be broken down into three main types. Black and white negative film, colour negative film and colour transparency film also known as slide film.
Negative films do exactly as the name suggests, they record a negative image to the film. Blacks and whites are reversed, primaries become secondaries on colour negative film. Some of you might have seen processed colour negatives and wondered why they are orange. This is simply to mask the imperfections of the dyes in the film.
Negative films are made so because they are designed for printing. When you expose a negative onto photographic paper, you get a normal, positive image.
Transparency film is designed to be projected rather than printed, much like you would have watched a film in the cinema before the advent of digital projectors. It is much less tolerant to incorrect exposure than negative films. It used to be able to be printed via an Ilford process called Cibachrome, however that has been discontinued. As far as I am aware, the only way to print transparency films these days is to digitise them.
What’s also important to note, especially for digital photographers is that the ISO, also known as ASA, is fixed. A film will have a speed rating such as 100, 200 or 400 ISO and the camera must be set to that ISO to shoot. There are ways to change the ISO through the film processing, however that’s not for this basic guide.
I should note that photographic films and processing are relatively expensive these days compared to the film era. This is a simple supply and demand issue, whilst film is seeing a resurgence, it’s nowhere near large enough to bring prices down. Typically you will pay $8-10 for a roll of 35mm black and white film plus $15-20 for processing and scanning.
As digital photographers you will be aware of different sensor sizes, from the very small ones on our phones to the medium format sensors of Hasselblad and Fuji. Film cameras are very much the same. At the peak of film photography in the 1990s, the smallest commercial film was Disk Film, this was really tiny and as the name suggests, each frame was placed around a disk rather than a roll.
Next came 110 and 126, before we got to the ubiquitous 35mm. From there we stepped up to 120/220, both the same width of film but 220 being able to take twice the number of exposure. These are commonly known as medium format. Above that we had 5×4 and 8×10 sheet film used in plate/field style cameras.
Returning to the modern day, 35mm, 120 and sheet films are still made and available, the smaller films are now obsolete.
Apart from a few speciality companies, film cameras are not mass produced anymore. However there is a massive secondhand market for these cameras. The recent resurgence of film photography has pushed up the price of these significantly, however they are still bargains compared to modern mirrorless cameras.
As you might guess, the camera you buy determines the film that it requires. By far the most commonly used format is 35mm and there are two main camera types you will find. The SLR is the direct predecessor to the modern DSLR and shares a lot of the same ergonomics. Secondly there are the compact, rangefinder cameras. These can be as simple as the excellent Olympus Trip all the way through to Leica Ms with their interchangeable lenses.
Medium format, 120 film gets a little more complicated and a lot more expensive, even used. The smallest medium format cameras are 645. These take 15 images on a roll of 120 and as the name suggests the frame size is 6 cm by 4.5 cm. Next we step up to 6×6, the most common medium format, then 6×7 and 6×9. Generally all these formats use different cameras. For example Mamiya did a compact 645 camera and a 6×9 Press camera whilst Hasselbald were famous for their 6×6 cameras.
As a newcomer to film photography, I would strongly recommend a 35mm SLR camera. These are the cheapest and most available. Buy from a reputable used dealer rather than eBay or marketplace. This will ensure that the camera is in good working order. Things to look out for are light leaks, slow running shutters and electrical issues.
You can also break down SLRs into two main eras. Pre 1990s, cameras were mainly manual focus, manual film wind and with fairly rudimentary exposure meters and modes. The 1990s saw the introduction of many of the features we see in modern cameras such as matrix metering and autofocus. They also often had motorized film advance built in.
Shooting With A Film Camera
Those used to modern digital cameras will be in for quite a culture shock. The first thing you will notice is how bright the viewfinders are, before realizing that the information in that viewfinder is severely lacking, often just an exposure scale.
There will be a dial on the exterior of the body for setting ISO and this is very important to set as the wrong ISO will give you incorrectly exposed images. Plus of course, you cannot see that the images are incorrectly exposed.
On older cameras, focussing can be quite a challenge. Even more modern autofocus film cameras were slow and unreliable. Focusing manually, you would have the viewfinder’s fresnel screen or split screen. If you have less than stellar eyesight, this can be quite a challenge.
Loading film requires dexterity and practice. Getting the end of the film into the slots on the spool can be hard and often different cameras have slightly different ways to achieve this. One tip for manually wound cameras, is to watch the film rewind lever after loading the film. If this turns as you wind the film on, it is loaded correctly.
You are going to need to get used to shooting either 24 or 36 frames before needing to change the film but more importantly not 100% knowing whether you have nailed the shot until you get the films processed. Speaking of which.
Film Processing and Printing
At the top I mentioned the three main types of photographic film, colour and black and white negative film and transparency. Each of these has a different way of being processed. Standard black and white film is actually pretty easy to process yourself, however you need to have a dust free environment to do it. You don’t actually need a darkroom as you can load the film into a processing tank inside a dark bag. This can be a bit fiddly at first but becomes second nature with practice. Once the film is in the drum you can do the actual processing in light.
Both colour negative and slide films require much more complicated processing that are really best suited to a professional lab. Slide/transparency film, in particular, is very prone to colour variations when processed.
If you do not want to go down the home processing route, most labs will also offer black and white processing. These days there are plenty of processing labs available although they are unlikely to be local. You usually have to post your film in, and wait a week or two. The lab will probably offer processing and printing or processing with scans only.
Printing colour or black and white negative films has two options. You can print directly from the negative onto photographic paper, or you can scan the negative and print on a home printer. Most modern labs will actually be scanning your negative although that scan will be output to real photographic paper.
The more ambitious amongst you might want to try printing black and white at home. Although you can print under a red light, your darkroom must be completely sealed from any external white light.
Enlargers and processing trays are readily available, and most decent camera stores stock the processing chemicals. It’s not a difficult task to print black and white yet, immensely satisfying.
So that’s my brief beginners guide to film photography. Film photography is a wonderful medium that can teach you patience, the value of an image and a deep understanding of exposure. It can be relatively expensive compared to digital but can give great satisfaction.
The Underwater Club Event: Innovating in Underwater Photography with Martin Broen
If you’ve been following DPG Masters over the years (and why wouldn’t you be?), you may know that there was one photographer who bagged the “Best of Show” twice in succession—in 2021 and 2022—for incredible black-and-white photos of Mexican cenotes. But there’s probably a few things you don’t know about Martin Broen. For one thing, he doesn’t only take prize-winning pictures of submerged caves: He’s received 50-plus awards for everything from wrecks and wildlife to macro. For another, he doesn’t just take pictures: He’s the designer of hundreds of innovative products and holds more than 130 innovation patents!
In other words, Martin is a fantastic person to have a chat with, and that’s exactly what Nicolas Remy, host of The Underwater Club (TUC), will be doing for his next Masterclass event. During the two-hour webinar, Martin will—of course—be talking about his amazing panorama, cave, wreck, and wildlife imagery, but he’ll also be discussing how problem-solving skills help to creatively tackle unique challenges in underwater photography. In addition, Nicolas will be finding out what Martin learned from his first foray into publishing, after the success of his cenote-focused coffee-table book Light in the Underworld.
As usual, TUC members join for free, while non-members will need to purchase tickets to the event at AU$49 (approx. US$35). Note that this is also the price of monthly membership, so this is the perfect opportunity to join the club and take advantage of all of the membership benefits.
Photographer Meg Loeks with the silver Sigma BF camera and 50mm F2 lens.
What’s not to love about the new BF camera by Sigma? With a strikingly sleek aesthetic, a solid aluminum build, and a minimalist design, it’s as durable as it is intuitive.
When I’m out with my children, I need a camera that feels like an extension of myself. I want it to feel like second nature, effortlessly there for every moment. The BF camera is just that and more. From playful afternoons at the arcade with my son to breezy moments at the beach with my daughter, this beautiful, stylish camera lets me stay present and focus on what matters most.
SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/200s, ISO 400SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/2500s, ISO 100
If I had to pick just two words to describe the BF camera it would be sophisticated and effortless. The sleek, modern design is visually appealing. With looks this good, it could double as modern home decor. This camera’s minimalist design ensures it remains effortlessly user-friendly. A camera doesn’t have to be complicated, and Sigma ensures that with a simple yet stylish aesthetic.
The Sigma BF is as durable as it is intuitive.
Compact and lightweight, the body is suited for life on the go, making it an ideal everyday companion. Though lightweight, the camera boasts a sturdy construction and solid build which is especially favorable for a photographer like me who’s often out chasing adventures with my kids in tow.
I’ve always found that composing through the LCD screen gives me a clearer sense of my frame.
One of my favorite features is that there are no memory card slots. The seamless, internal storage design once again makes everything feel effortless. With no cards to manage, it truly keeps things simple and worry-free.
And as someone who rarely ever uses a viewfinder, I also appreciate its omission allowing for a more compact, sleek camera design and modern LCD screen. As a photographer specifically specializing in children’s portraiture, I’ve always found that composing through the LCD screen gives me a clearer sense of my frame. Not to mention, helping me capture key moments without missing a beat.
SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/2500s, ISO 100SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/200s, ISO 250
The camera’s continuous capture rate is swift at 8 frames per second. I occasionally found it too quick, in fact, and switched to single capture for more precise control. When my children were on the move, continuous capture was indispensable for freezing those fast-paced, fleeting moments. The autofocus accuracy in low-light conditions, particularly when my son was darting around the arcade, was nothing short of impressive.
The Sigma BF also camera features automatic face and eye detection for both people and pets, enabling seamless subject tracking. What’s more, the function is active by default, further streamlining the friendly user experience.
SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/200s, ISO 400SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/200s, ISO 250
For more precise control, I could switch to single point focus whether in single or continuous autofocus modes. While the autofocusing features of this camera are more curated, they’re ideal and efficient for anyone on the go, allowing for more time to stay immersed in the moment rather than fumbling with countless focus settings.
SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2.5, 1/160s, ISO 125
Another feature I genuinely love is the touch screen focusing. It’s something I’ve frequently used in the past, so I was pleased to see it thoughtfully included in this camera’s design.
The BF feels like the perfect travel companion, equally at home when you’re doing everything or nothing at all.
Last but certainly not least, the image quality is outstanding. Given the Sigma BF camera’s minimalist design, I was thrilled by how sharp and detailed the photos turned out. Even in low light conditions, the clarity and definition held up beautifully. I was also really drawn to the camera’s film-like color rendering. It brings a nostalgic, cinematic feel to images that’s intentional and beautiful.
SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/2500s, ISO 100SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/200s, ISO 640
SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/200s, ISO 320
Sigma unveiled nine updated prime lenses that color-match the sleek BF camera to maintain a cohesive look. My go-to portrait lens is the 50mm F2 DG | Contemporary, and I was consistently impressed by its focusing performance in a range of challenging lighting conditions, from low light to backlight, while my children were constantly on the go. The bokeh was smooth and round, adding to the overall sense of magic I was able to capture. From icy mornings in our yard to playful adventures at the arcade, the bokeh quality enhances the overall mood and atmosphere of my images.
SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/2500s, ISO 100SIGMA BF CAMERA 50mm F2 DG | CONTEMPORARY F2, 1/200s, ISO 640
Though its minimal design is far from ordinary, this camera is perfectly suited for everyday moments. Its thoughtful design and sleek aesthetic make it ideal for those who value both form and function. It feels like the perfect travel companion, equally at home when you’re doing everything or nothing at all. There’s beauty in keeping things simple, and Sigma makes that possible with the BF camera, letting you stay immersed in the moment rather than gadgets and settings.
When you’re selling products online, first impressions happen fast—and they almost always happen visually. If you’re an ecommerce brand or product photographer, you know how important it is to get every detail just right. One of the most overlooked (but critical) details? Symmetry.
Humans are wired to crave symmetry. It signals beauty, balance, and trust—exactly the feelings you want to trigger when someone lands on your product page.
When you think about symmetric photos, think ecommerce photography for apparel, shoes, accessories, cosmetics, electronics, and anything presented in a clean, controlled environment. Symmetry matters even more in apparel photography, especially for things like ghost mannequin shots where structure, balance, and form all drive buyer confidence.
Why you need symmetric product photos
Studies show that 87% of online shoppers believe enhanced product content is helpful to them during their shopping journey. In today’s competitive landscape, delivering symmetric, polished images isn’t optional—it’s the bare minimum.
Here’s why:
Aesthetic: Symmetry creates a polished, professional look that immediately elevates your brand.
Easybrowsing: Balanced images are easier to process visually, making it faster for customers to evaluate and compare products.
Visualtrust: Symmetry builds instant credibility and makes your brand feel more reliable.
Emotionalappeal: Symmetrical compositions feel satisfying, calm, and complete — all things that lower buying friction.
Performancemetrics: Symmetrical product photos often convert better, boosting both clicks and sales.
That’s where Path comes in. Our expert editors apply symmetry with care—enhancing your product’s natural design without making it look artificial or over-edited.
When and how to use symmetric ecommerce photos
Highly detailed products
If you sell jewelry, electronics, watches, or anything intricate, symmetry highlights the craftsmanship and premium quality you’re trying to showcase.
Highlight centerpiece items
Hero images, like your main PDP photo or homepage feature, need to feel instantly strong and balanced. Symmetry gives products that commanding presence.
Premium products and brands
Luxury brands know: symmetry is a visual shortcut to higher perceived value. It signals attention to detail, care, and sophistication.
Selling symmetrical products
When you sell mirrors, tech gadgets, skincare bottles, apparel, shoes, accessories, cosmetics — basically anything designed with balance in mind — your photos should mirror that symmetry. It reinforces design quality and makes browsing intuitive.
Bonus: Ghost mannequin shots especially benefit from perfect symmetry to create clean, realistic apparel displays.
Marketplace product photography
Symmetrical product photos aren’t just nice—they perform better in marketplace search results and listings, helping you stand out in crowded spaces. If you sell on marketplaces like Amazon, eBay, etc., you might even be required to use symmetric product photos.
Marketing and advertising campaigns
Symmetry draws the eye and keeps viewers engaged. Whether you’re designing social media ads, web banners, or print catalogs, symmetric images create irresistible visual flow.
High-end retouching
Good symmetry editing polishes natural flaws—like a slightly crooked seam or uneven laces—without making your product look artificial. It’s subtle, invisible craftsmanship that makes a major difference.
Tips for symmetric product photography
Here’s the key to mastering symmetry without overdoing it:
✅ Keep the product’s natural shape and design intact.
✅ Center lines, balance proportions, and adjust visible angles carefully.
✅ Use symmetry to enhance authenticity—not to create a fake-looking “clone.”
🚫 Don’t force symmetry where it doesn’t naturally exist.
🚫 Avoid warping, pinching, or unnaturally stretching parts of the product.
🚫 Stay away from edits that make products feel sterile or “too perfect”—buyers can tell.
Get it perfect, every time
Symmetry isn’t just about making your photos look good—it’s about building trust and driving sales. In ecommerce, symmetry is a small investment that delivers a big payoff.
Ready to sharpen your product photos with perfect symmetry? At Path, our expert editors specialize in balancing precision with authenticity. We’ll polish your product images so they feel clean, credible, and irresistible—all with quick turnaround times, industry-leading accuracy, and deep ecommerce expertise.
The 2025 Environmental Photography Award winners have been announced—and the Grand Prize Winner is an intriguing underwater image. Shot by Angel Fitor, the winning photo in the Ocean Worlds category, called “Unseen Unsung Heroes,” is a fascinating capture of polychaete worms flushing sand out of their burrows on a seagrass bed in the Spanish Mediterranean. The worms maintain oxygen circulation in the upper layers of sediment, a crucial role that allows a whole ecosystem to thrive under the substrate. At a global scale, the unsung activity of these perpetually hidden worms has significant consequences. Fitor says his winning shot “portrays the silent actions of humble creatures that nonetheless have a pivotal influence on the entire Mediterranean marine ecosystem—an ecosystem upon which we, in turn, depend.”
Honoring photographers who raise awareness about environmental issues and spotlight environmental challenges, the annual Environmental Photography Award was founded in 2021 to celebrate the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation’s 15th anniversary. This year, a prestigious jury of environmentalists, conservation photojournalists and filmmakers—including well-known names Ami Vitale, Aaron Gekoski and Ralph Pace—selected winners in five categories: Polar Wonders, Into the Forest, Ocean Worlds, Humanity versus Nature, and Change Makers: Reasons for Hope. Impressively, Fitor also won the Change Makers: Reasons for Hope category with an image showcasing a baby loggerhead sea turtle in a Spanish recovery center. Two more of his images were shortlisted in the Ocean Worlds category. In the Polar Wonders category, the winning image was also shot underwater: Galice Hoarau’s capture of a lion’s mane jellyfish in the frigid waters of Greenland.
The winners of the second annual edition of The Nature Photography Contest have been revealed, with Christopher Paetkau crowned overall winner for a wonderful shot of a polar bear resting in a field of vibrant fireweed flowers. Alongside Paetkau’s “Photography of the Year,” Thomas Vijayan was named “Photographer of the Year” for demonstrating “his keen eye for composition, storytelling, and the delicate balance that governs the natural world” across various categories.
Among those different categories, of course, it was “Underwater” that we were most excited to see. DPGer James Ferrara’s perfectly framed shot of a sperm whale cruising through clumps of sargassum weed—featured in his DPG Photographer of the Week article—was the category winner among a wonderful selection of finalists by Simon Biddie, Ilaria Mariagiulia Rizzuto, Kwon Chan, Lorincz Ferenc, Wan Yong Chong, Remuna Beca, Andy Lambert, Jun He, and Theo Maynier.
Check out the “Underwater” category finalists below, and head over to the competition website to see the rest of the recognized images. The Nature Photography Contest 2025 is expected to launch in May.
Underwater Finalist: “A Sunrise Glide” by Simon Biddie
Underwater Finalist: “Bad Boy” by Ilaria Mariagiulia Rizzuto
Underwater Finalist: “Big Dreams” by Kwon Chan
Underwater Finalist: “Carp Love” by Lorincz Ferenc
Underwater Finalist: “Circle of Life” by Wan Yong Chong
Underwater Finalist: “Connection” by Remuna Beca
Underwater Finalist: “Jellyfish” by Andy Lambert
Underwater Finalist: “Pike Hunting” by Ferenc Lorincz
Underwater Finalist: “Place of Residence” by Jun He
Underwater Finalist: “Sous Ecorte” by Theo Maynier
Photographer, Filmmaker, and Conservationist: Florian Schulz
Heidi: We are a culture distracted by screen and cell service – is your photography and film work partially an act of resistance? Floiran: As a photographer and filmmaker, I often find myself at the intersection of creativity and technology. While social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram are undeniably powerful tools for sharing work and connecting with others, I have a complex relationship with them. On one hand, they provide valuable insights into the work of colleagues and friends, as well as access to news and thought-provoking statements. However, I also see them as significant sources of misinformation, where quantity often trumps quality, and the loudest voices can overshadow meaningful content.
In my personal life, my wife and I have made a conscious decision to limit screen time for our children. Our 9- and 13-year-olds do not have cell phones, and screens are not used for entertainment. (We do watch nature documentaries on the TV) This choice has allowed them to develop remarkable creativity and a keen awareness of the world around them. They observe how excessive screen time affects their peers, and it’s heartening to see them thrive without the constant distraction of digital media.
In this sense, my photography and filmmaking can be seen as acts of resistance against the prevailing culture of distraction. By focusing on creating meaningful, high-quality content that encourages reflection and engagement, I aim to counterbalance the fast-paced, often superficial nature of social media. My work is about capturing moments that inspire, provoke thought, and foster connection on a deeper level.
Moreover, the process of creating art without the constant influence of social media allows me to tap into my own creative potential more authentically. It enables me to explore themes and ideas that might not fit into the algorithm-driven narratives that dominate online platforms. This approach not only enriches my work but also contributes to a broader cultural dialogue that values substance over spectacle.
Ultimately, my goal is to inspire others to step back from the screens and engage with the world around them. By doing so, I hope to contribute to a shift in how we consume and interact with media, one that prioritizes depth, creativity, and genuine connection. Nature is wild and she works on her terms – how has this lack of control informed your creative work and life? Yes, nature is wild and unpredictable. That is exactly what I love about my work! This career that I have chosen is not such much of a simple job, work, a career, – it is rather the inevitable path I had to walk because of my passion for wild places, the adventure that comes with it and the desire to be in the presence of wild creatures. To do my work well, I need to be out in the wild for extended periods of times. This has always been my goal and accordingly I have chosen projects that allowed me to do this. What is beautiful about it is that one has to let go of control and especially when documenting wildlife I have to give in to a more organic approach. Sometimes when I am waiting for hours for an animal to appear or a certain behavior to show this work has a meditative element. I have to be here and now in the present. The sounds, sights, smells – the wind and weather conditions. All of it is important to take in or to capture in a series of photographs to document an ecosystem with its wildlife. I love the idea that moments and images have to “come to you”. The animals have to present themselves, that is when the good images get taken. After doing this for so many decades I also realize that it is not just the final image that counts for me – but the entire experience. As all of this takes a lot of time, we are just now at a particular crossroads. Even though I have always tried to have my family be a part of the adventure it was only possible at certain times. We are now embarking onto a new path where we are going to be exploring the wild as an entire family. We will start with some of the most exciting wild places across Alaska. From the fjords and forests of South East Alaska to the Arctic Tundra of the North or the bears coast along the Alaska peninsula.
Does all your work come with a call to action? If a photographer wanted to get started supporting a cause, what’s the best way to start? You are right that a lot of my work over the past decades has been mission driven and often included a call to action. The hope to help with the conservation of ecosystems comes across in the stories I tell through my images. As a conservation photographer, my goal is to inspire viewers to care about the natural world and its wildlife. Whether it’s documenting the majesty of wild places or highlighting the challenges faced by endangered species, my work aims to raise awareness and encourage action.
For photographers looking to support a cause, I would recommend starting by identifying what truly resonates with them. It might be a specific species, ecosystem, or environmental issue. Once you’ve found your passion, immerse yourself in learning about the topic. Collaborate with experts, such as scientists or conservationists, to gain a deeper understanding of the challenges and potential solutions.
Networking is also crucial. Join organizations like the International League of Conservation Photographers (ILCP), which I co-founded, to connect with like-minded photographers and learn from their experiences. Engage with conservation groups and consider partnering with them to amplify your message.
Lastly, use your platform to share your story. Whether through social media, exhibitions, or publications, make sure your work reaches the right audience. Remember, the power of photography lies not just in capturing stunning images but in inspiring change and motivating others to take action.
In my own journey, projects like “Freedom to Roam” or the effort to help with the permanent protection of the Arctic Refuge have shown me the impact that visual storytelling can have on conservation efforts. By sharing compelling narratives and images, photographers can play a vital role in shaping public awareness and influencing policy decisions.
What cues do you recall when your first realized your photography/filmmaking gave agency to the biodiversity and landscape, presenting the Arctic as worth protecting rather than just a barren energy resource? I believe a big reason why conservation was such a big topic for myself from early on was me growing up in Germany. In Germany and across most European countries we had lost large interconnected wild ecosystems. While we have a 1000 year old castle around the corner from where I grow up, we had lost wild places. This feeling of loss, made me cherish the big wild places across North America. Whether it was the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem where we would still find bears, bison, elk and wolves, or the wild coastlines or the Arctic where the ancient caribou herds would still roam. There was never a time where I could look at these great arctic landscapes as “barren wastelands”. The fight for the Arctic Refuge has been going on for many decades and I have been involved with the Refuge for the last 25 years. It has always been a collaborative effort to fight for the Arctic Refuge alongside the Gwich’in People and many conservation organizations. My images and film work have been a central part in a lot of these efforts and campaigns. From big live speaking tours, many magazine articles to massive signature campaigns, like during the #ProtectTheArctic campaign that inspire millions to take action. This campaign resulted in an unprecedented 6 million comments submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, effectively stopping seismic testing in the Arctic Refuge. Unfortunately, the battle the Arctic Refuge and other wild places is long lasting tug of war.
What can you share about this image from your coffee table book, To The Arctic? I near a group of muskox bulls and find myself wishing for a musk ox’s coat to protect me from the weather. Their long guard hair hangs from their bodies like beautiful overcoats. Underneath, their wool is eight times warmer than the highest-quality sheep wool. I feel the gripping cold, especially on my face, where the snow crystals lash my skin like grains of sand. But I am excited about this turn in the weather. It allows me to create photographs that show a true Arctic scene, with conditions these musk oxen have to withstand many times in the course of the year. The wind becomes so intense that the animals almost disappear behind a curtain of blowing snow, their long hair rippling around them like soft cloth. I try to get close enough to capture their image before the sun dips behind the ridgeline. Dropping to my knees, I frame the scene as the last rays cast pink light on the musk oxen’s fur. Then something magical happens. Three bulls take off from the group, heading directly toward the setting sun. For an instant they are in perfect formation. The blowing snow is so thick that it makes the three bulls seem to float magically above the ground. A photograph of a lifetime-and worth everything I had to endure to get it.
Patagonia celebrated your conservation work for ANWR in their Fall catalogs (2016 and 2024) both being election years, what feels different this second time around about impacts we can make as individuals and collectives? I’m honored to have been a part of Patagonia’s conservation efforts, including their campaigns highlighting the importance of protecting the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). The recent “Alaska Needs You” campaign underscores the urgency of our collective action. What is different today after the recent election: “ Alaska Needs You More Than Ever! “ However, it is not just about Alaska; many wild places are under threat due to a wholesale mentality of exploiting public lands and resources, which will ultimately rob future generations of their natural heritage.
The current landscape is complicated by attacks on democratic values, the environment, public lands, and marginalized communities. Misinformation is a significant obstacle, as it often misleads people into believing that exploiting public lands will benefit underprivileged Americans, when in reality, it primarily enriches corporations and billionaires.
However, I remain hopeful. There is a growing recognition of the need for collective action. By coming together as a community, we can fight against these challenges and protect our planet’s biodiversity. The power of collaboration, as seen in campaigns like “Alaska Needs You,” demonstrates that when individuals and organizations unite, we can inspire meaningful change and safeguard the future of our wild places.
One of the oil drill pads at the edge of the Arctic Refuge just west of the Canning River delta. Oil companies have pushed for opening the Arctic Refuge to the east of the Canning River for oil development. Canning River Delta, Alaskan Arctic
You’ve called Alaska home for the past 15 years, a place where mining, drilling, and extraction remain real threats to land, biodiversity, how are you thinking about your work these days? Every day we are chipping away at the last open spaces and wild lands. The current administration is doing this at a massively accelerated pace. Unfortunately, it is the same old story that is repeating itself. The main difference is, that we have less and less wilderness around us and the speed of exploitation is ever faster. What I am planning to continue to do is fight the same old fight but with different stories and from different perspectives. I personally have to pace myself and also consider my children. If I will always bring up all the critical things I see it is hard for them to be joyful. All this consciousness weighs hard on myself and that gets passed on to them. I want to let my children go and see the beauty of this planet with their curious joyful eyes. So in the coming years, that might be part of the way I will tell stories for us to protect earth for future generations. What are you working on now? I am currently putting on the finishing touches on a presentation I will give at the Patagonia Soho Store in New York City on March 19th. At the same time we are in the middle of planning multiple expeditions across Alaska. This spring we are hoping to document bears coming out of their winter dens. We will also be working in areas across the vast coastal areas of Southeast Alaska and later in the summer across Arctic Alaska. My family will be part of many of the expeditions.
AI images have been circulating the internet, more than ever for about a couple of years now and with AI being integrated into most editing programs, google has also been working on several models and one of the most recent is the Gemini 2.0 Flash experimental model. If you are looking to access the features of Google Gemini, you will need to have a google account and be signed in.
Image via Google
Google has already been working with many models in the past and their most capable one seems to be the Gemini 2.0. Gemini 2.0 Flash experimental model is built on the success of Gemini 1.5 flash and is available freely to all Gemini users. Gemini 2.0 Flash is faster and comes with new capabilities like natively generated images mixed with text.
Gemini 2.0 Flash requires the user to type in prompts that ask Gemini to create an image based on the description provided. You can further change elements or subjects in your images through further prompts. You also have the option to choose a desired aspect ratio for the final image through prompts. In the experimental version, you will get a resulting image that has a watermark on it.
Besides the above process of generating images, you can also upload your own image and make changes to it. For example, if you are using a portrait, you can make changes to the outfit, hair, etc., adding hair or try to get different poses/perspectives of the image. For example a side view, a lower perspective of an image and so on. This is applicable for all genre of photos.
Besides the above, Gemini 2.0 Flash can also be used to remove unwanted objects or replace objects from a photo, replace backgrounds or even colorise photos. The results achieved using Gemini 2.0 Flash and the capabilities are more similar to the jobs done using photoshop, where some tools in the program were used to perform these actions, whereas in Gemini 2.0 Flash the job is done using prompts.
With the Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental already being tried by many users it looks like it could kill programs like Photoshop in the near future, but generating images using prompts, with the help of AI – is this still photography? All these advancements in the field of AI makes us question if we can trust photos anymore, especially when used as evidences. It also makes us check the credibility of the photographer presenting an image.
We think AI may change photography in some areas, but it can never replace genuine photography. What are your thoughts on this? Let us know in the comments section below. We would love to hear.
We have more news for you to read if you are interested at this link here.
This seems like a good time to remind everyone that the photography industry had a brief “me too” moment back in 2018-2020.
Several big photographers were named in a couple of excellent articles in the Columbia Journalism Review by Kristen Chick and Vox by A.J. Chavar.
I’m sure there are many who never came forward because while the initial outrage caused the named to disappear and delete all their social media, they soon crawl back. Two people I’ve been following are David Alan Harvey and Patrick Witty.
In the article by Kristen Chick, “Eleven women have described to CJR inappropriate behavior from David Alan Harvey over a span of thirteen years, ranging from suggestive comments to unwanted sexual advances to masturbating without their consent on video calls.” His agency, Magnum, was told about it and sat on the information for a decade before suspending him.
So what is David up to now? He’s very active on Threads, where he has 57,000 followers. On Instagram, his account is private, but he has 441,000 followers. On his website, he’s selling prints, has five in-person workshops slated for 2025, and offers online mentorships.
In the article by A.J. Chavar that talks about Patrick Witty: “I spoke to more than 20 people — some of them friends of mine in our shared industry — who said they experienced unwanted interactions with Witty, witnessed the inappropriate behavior, or were told details at the time the events occurred that corroborated the women’s stories. These stories included accounts of unwanted touching, kissing, and other advances at a variety of professional events during and prior to Witty’s employment at National Geographic.”
So what is Patrick up to now? Semafor is reporting that he’s been hired by the White House. Prior to that he was very active on Instagram with 72,000 followers, Threads with 12,000 followers, and has a substack with 3,300 subscribers where he lists his bonafides as a photo editor at National Geographic, WIRED, TIME, and The New York Times.
Do I think these people should be cancelled for their alleged creep-ass behavior that potentially ruined the careers of 30 women plus countless others who headed the other direction once the alarm sounded in their heads?
YES.
But you can do what you feel in your heart. When I brought Patrick’s behavior to the attention of “A Photographic Life” podcaster Grant Scott (former AD at Elle and Tatler) and his host Bill Shapiro (former EIC at LIFE), after they quoted him in a podcast, they refused to remove the quote or take down the podcast where they recommended people subscribe to Patrick’s Substack. Bill has subsequently become chummy with Patrick on Threads, engaging him in conversation on several occasions.
If that weren’t enough, in a subsequent podcast, Bill Shapiro quoted Bill Frakes who has a Wikipedia entry that states “The University of Nebraska–Lincoln (UNL) found that Frakes engaged in sexual misconduct and sexual harassment while he was a visiting professor. Frakes was found to have made unwanted comments about women students’ bodies and clothing according to a document obtained by The Omaha World-Herald.”
I think it’s important not to memory-hole what happened. Grant Scott told me he had no idea about Patrick since he works in the UK. Bill Shapiro just told me I was being mean. If industry leaders, despite their cranky old age, refuse to acknowledge the hard work of journalists and the women who brought this information to light, there’s no reason this behavior won’t persist. Personally, I refuse to forget that our male-dominated industry creates challenges for women, and we need to continuously work to rectify that. Lets not erase the work that has already been done.