برچسب: Movement

  • April 2025 Photo Contest Winners: The Essence Of Movement

    April 2025 Photo Contest Winners: The Essence Of Movement


    We’re happy to announce the winner of April’s competition “The Essence Of Movement.”

    For those who don’t know, the Light Stalking Monthly Photography Competition carries a $100 People’s Choice Award and a $250 Overall Winner Award. The People’s Choice Winner is selected by a vote of the community, whereas our guest judge selects the overall winner.

    The “Essence Of Movement” Photo Contest

    Capturing movement in photography is a great way to show dynamism in an otherwise static scene. Most action scenes would benefit from either freezing movements or capturing the movements in the form of motion blur in order to tell the story effectively and photographers will need to study and understand the scene and use the right settings, especially the camera’s shutter speed to get the results they desire.

    Besides the above, for a moving subject, tracking focus will be a great feature to use when capturing movements. The photographer can track the subject’s movement while allowing the background to blur and show movement or can allow the subject to blur and keep the background static. All these depend on the photographer’s creative vision and what they intend to capture.

    Movements in photography can be captured in various ways – one can freeze a moment if desired, using a very fast shutter speed, or use techniques like motion blur, panning, long exposures, etc. This can be done with elements in nature or scenes from day to day life.

    April’s contest theme was “The Essence Of Movement” and the images submitted to the contest were varied, with images from nature, setups, events like dance, sports and the participants used different techniques like panning, long exposure, zoom effect, motion blur, intentional camera movement and even freezing the moment to capture their shots.

    When choosing the winning photos, we wanted to make sure that the decision process was based on a good interpretation of the theme followed by other factors like light, composition, story, details, creative vision / thought, etc. The results are entirely subjective and there are no losers in any competition as we all know. 

    Here are April’s winners:

    First Place: “Happiness in Action” by Jean T

    Happiness in Action – Copyright Jean T

    Jean T has used motion blur to capture the story and he has chosen the right shutter speed to capture enough details, while still showing movement in the photo. The image of the two subjects enjoying the ice skating moment tells the story beautifully though their pose and Jean made sure to capture the right moment.

    Jean has also made sure to not include any more subjects from the scene and to focus on just the two subjects and their interaction. The muted colours in the frame contribute to the cold atmosphere and the exposure is just right to capture some details of the ice and not have any clippings in the bright areas.

    Congratulations on the win Jean and the painterly look of the photo is just beautiful!

    Second Place: “Rush” by Patrick

    Speed and Dynamism – Copyright Patrick

    The photo “Rush” by Patrick shows speed and dynamism as the description provided by Patrick. Patrick has chosen the right shutter speed and used the panning technique to capture movement in the scene. The movement in the frame is evident on the subject, the bicycle and the background, but Patrick has made sure to keep the subject’s face in focus.

    The lines in the frame work together as great compositional elements pointing towards the subject and then the direction of movement of the subject. Patrick’s choice to convert the image to black and white has worked really well allowing the viewer to just focus on the subject and not get distracted by anything else in the frame.

    Congratulations Patrick for this well thought and executed shot!

    Third Place: “Fast Flyer” by Pat Garrett

    Fast Flyer – Copyright Pat Garrett

    The photo “Fast Flyer” by Pat stands true to the title. Hummingbirds are generally difficult to photograph because of their rapid movements and their smaller size. Pat has used the right shutter speed to capture great details on the bird, especially the eyes.

    Without very fast shutter speeds, it can be difficult to capture wing details of the humming bird, but Pat has again made use of the right choice for shutter speed to show wing movement, but also managed to preserve details on both the wings which makes the resulting image look perfect. Also the negative space around the hummingbird, especially more in the direction that it is looking, helps to keep the composition in balance. The slight blur on the birds legs also contribute to the movements captured in the image.

    Congratulations on this amazing shot Pat!

    People’s Choice Award Winner

    Our monthly photo contests also come with a People’s Choice Award. The winner of this part of the contest receives $100 worth of store credit on Lightstalking which they can spend as they please on our blueprints, drills, courses or Presets.

    Water Drops Colliding – Copyright Frogdaily

    The most popular photo for April, voted by the contestants was “Water Drops Colliding” by Frogdaily which has won the people’s choice award. Frogdaily has made use of the right setup that includes light, background and shutter speed to execute this shot. The lighting used and the moment captured is so perfect with the rule of odds in play and the three layers work well together by sharing an interesting connection, while the top layer makes the image even more interesting by breaking repetition.

    The monochrome treatment makes the image stand out and lets the viewer focus on the shapes/forms of the water drops. The black background really makes the water drops stand out by detailing the lines and textures created by light and water drops splashing. Congratulations Frogdaily on the win and a beautifully made image.

    We are two weeks into this month’s photo contest and still have two weeks left to submit photos to our May’s monthly contest. It has already seen some entries with interesting submissions. This month our theme is “Storytelling In A Single Frame.”

    If you would like to join and enter some images into our monthly contest then take a look at your options here.





    Source link

  • The Very Brief #MeToo Movement In Professional Photography – A Photo Editor


    Screenshot

    This seems like a good time to remind everyone that the photography industry had a brief “me too” moment back in 2018-2020.

    Several big photographers were named in a couple of excellent articles in the Columbia Journalism Review by Kristen Chick and Vox by A.J. Chavar.

    I’m sure there are many who never came forward because while the initial outrage caused the named to disappear and delete all their social media, they soon crawl back. Two people I’ve been following are David Alan Harvey and Patrick Witty.

    In the article by Kristen Chick, “Eleven women have described to CJR inappropriate behavior from David Alan Harvey over a span of thirteen years, ranging from suggestive comments to unwanted sexual advances to masturbating without their consent on video calls.” His agency, Magnum, was told about it and sat on the information for a decade before suspending him.

    So what is David up to now? He’s very active on Threads, where he has 57,000 followers. On Instagram, his account is private, but he has 441,000 followers. On his website, he’s selling prints, has five in-person workshops slated for 2025, and offers online mentorships.

    In the article by A.J. Chavar that talks about Patrick Witty: “I spoke to more than 20 people — some of them friends of mine in our shared industry — who said they experienced unwanted interactions with Witty, witnessed the inappropriate behavior, or were told details at the time the events occurred that corroborated the women’s stories. These stories included accounts of unwanted touching, kissing, and other advances at a variety of professional events during and prior to Witty’s employment at National Geographic.”

    So what is Patrick up to now? Semafor is reporting that he’s been hired by the White House. Prior to that he was very active on Instagram with 72,000 followers, Threads with 12,000 followers, and has a substack with 3,300 subscribers where he lists his bonafides as a photo editor at National Geographic, WIRED, TIME, and The New York Times.

    Do I think these people should be cancelled for their alleged creep-ass behavior that potentially ruined the careers of 30 women plus countless others who headed the other direction once the alarm sounded in their heads?

    YES.

    But you can do what you feel in your heart. When I brought Patrick’s behavior to the attention of “A Photographic Life” podcaster Grant Scott (former AD at Elle and Tatler) and his host Bill Shapiro (former EIC at LIFE), after they quoted him in a podcast, they refused to remove the quote or take down the podcast where they recommended people subscribe to Patrick’s Substack. Bill has subsequently become chummy with Patrick on Threads, engaging him in conversation on several occasions.

    If that weren’t enough, in a subsequent podcast, Bill Shapiro quoted Bill Frakes who has a Wikipedia entry that states “The University of Nebraska–Lincoln (UNL) found that Frakes engaged in sexual misconduct and sexual harassment while he was a visiting professor. Frakes was found to have made unwanted comments about women students’ bodies and clothing according to a document obtained by The Omaha World-Herald.”

    I think it’s important not to memory-hole what happened. Grant Scott told me he had no idea about Patrick since he works in the UK. Bill Shapiro just told me I was being mean. If industry leaders, despite their cranky old age, refuse to acknowledge the hard work of journalists and the women who brought this information to light, there’s no reason this behavior won’t persist. Personally, I refuse to forget that our male-dominated industry creates challenges for women, and we need to continuously work to rectify that. Lets not erase the work that has already been done.





    Source link